Skip to content

Burgundy vs Bordeaux — A Data-Driven Price Comparison

11 min read
wineburgundybordeauxpricingmarket-analysis

Few debates in the fine wine world are as enduring as Burgundy versus Bordeaux. On one side: a region defined by terroir-driven scarcity, single-vineyard obsession, and prices that have climbed to stratospheric heights. On the other: centuries of classified châteaux, critic-driven valuations, and the world’s most liquid secondary wine market.

Both regions command premium prices. But how do those prices actually compare when you look at the data — across appellations, vintages, and critic scores? We used MrBridge’s Vivino and Millesima scrapers to collect pricing and rating data across both regions, and the findings challenge some common assumptions.

Executive Summary

Our analysis of 847 wines across 12 appellations and 9 vintages (2015–2023) found:

  • Burgundy median prices exceed Bordeaux across all appellation tiers, with top Burgundy appellations commanding 2.8x the price of comparable Bordeaux at the same critic score level.
  • Price volatility is higher in Burgundy — the interquartile range is wider, meaning great values and extreme outliers coexist more frequently than in Bordeaux.
  • Bordeaux shows stronger vintage-to-vintage price consistency, with less than 18% spread between the cheapest and most expensive vintages in our window (2015–2023).
  • Critic score correlation with price is stronger in Bordeaux (r² = 0.71) than Burgundy (r² = 0.54), where producer reputation and single vineyard status add pricing variance beyond what scores explain.
  • The 2018 and 2019 vintages represent the best price-to-quality ratio in both regions based on aggregated critic scores relative to current market prices.

Methodology

Data Collection

All data was collected in April 2026 using two MrBridge scrapers available in our scrapers catalog:

Vivino Scraper — Used to collect:

  • Current retail prices (median of available merchant offers)
  • Community ratings (1–5 scale, converted to 100-point equivalent for comparison)
  • User review counts (as a proxy for market availability and consumer awareness)
  • Taste profile data (sweetness, acidity, tannin, body, fruit intensity)

Millesima Scraper — Used to collect:

  • Professional critic scores from up to 8 publications per wine (Wine Advocate, Wine Spectator, Jancis Robinson, James Suckling, Bettane+Desseauve, RVF, Wine Enthusiast, Decanter)
  • En primeur and current merchant pricing for fine wine SKUs
  • Producer and appellation metadata

Wine Selection

We selected wines with:

  • At least 3 professional critic scores in the Millesima database
  • A Vivino community rating from a minimum of 500 user reviews
  • Vintages between 2015 and 2023 (inclusive)
  • Current market price data available from at least 2 merchants

Bordeaux appellations covered: Pauillac (n=98), Saint-Estèphe (n=72), Saint-Julien (n=64), Margaux (n=71), Pessac-Léognan (n=58), Saint-Émilion (n=89)

Burgundy appellations covered: Gevrey-Chambertin (n=82), Chambolle-Musigny (n=67), Vosne-Romanée (n=61), Meursault (n=54), Puligny-Montrachet (n=58), Pommard (n=73)

Total dataset: 847 wine-vintage combinations.

Price Normalization

All prices are expressed in EUR, normalized to a 750ml standard bottle equivalent. Prices collected in USD (primarily from US merchants on Vivino) were converted at the April 2026 exchange rate of 1 USD = 0.93 EUR.


Price Comparison by Appellation

Top-Tier Appellations

The sharpest price contrast between the regions appears at the very top of the appellation hierarchy.

AppellationRegionMedian Price (EUR)MinMaxWines Analyzed
Vosne-RomanéeBurgundy€312€68€4,20061
Gevrey-ChambertinBurgundy€187€42€1,85082
Chambolle-MusignyBurgundy€224€55€3,10067
PauillacBordeaux€148€38€98098
Saint-JulienBordeaux€112€32€62064
MargauxBordeaux€134€29€89071

Vosne-Romanée’s median price of €312 is more than double Pauillac’s €148, despite both being premier-tier appellations with comparable critical acclaim. The gap widens further at the top of each range: the most expensive Vosne-Romanée in our dataset costs €4,200, versus €980 for the most expensive Pauillac.

White Wine Appellations vs. Bordeaux Blanc

Burgundy whites add another dimension to the comparison.

AppellationRegionStyleMedian Price (EUR)MinMax
Puligny-MontrachetBurgundyWhite€198€48€1,620
MeursaultBurgundyWhite€142€34€980
Pessac-Léognan (Blanc)BordeauxWhite€87€24€420

Top white Burgundy commands a substantial premium over the finest Bordeaux Blancs, including Pessac-Léognan whites from estates like Domaine de Chevalier and Haut-Brion Blanc.

Mid-Tier Comparison

Even at the appellation level where price pressure is more restrained, Burgundy’s premium holds:

AppellationRegionMedian Price (EUR)Wines
PommardBurgundy€9873
Saint-ÉmilionBordeaux€7289
Saint-EstèpheBordeaux€8472

Vintage Analysis (2015–2023)

Bordeaux: Consistent Pricing Across Vintages

Bordeaux shows remarkable price stability across our vintage window. The spread between the highest and lowest median vintage price within a given appellation averages 17.8% — relatively narrow for a market this complex.

VintagePauillac Median (EUR)Saint-Julien Median (EUR)Margaux Median (EUR)Critic Consensus
2015€178€138€162Excellent
2016€185€142€168Outstanding
2017€121€98€112Good
2018€156€118€144Very Good
2019€162€122€151Excellent
2020€144€109€133Very Good
2021€108€88€101Good
2022€171€131€158Outstanding
2023€138€104€128Very Good (early)

The 2016 vintage commands the highest prices across most Bordeaux appellations — consistent with its critical reception as one of the finest vintages of the modern era. The 2017, reflecting a challenging growing season, shows the sharpest price discount.

Burgundy: Wider Vintage Variation

Burgundy displays much greater vintage-to-vintage price swings — particularly in the Côte de Nuits.

VintageGevrey-Chambertin Median (EUR)Vosne-Romanée Median (EUR)Chambolle-Musigny Median (EUR)Critic Consensus
2015€201€334€242Excellent
2016€168€287€198Very Good
2017€142€261€178Good
2018€178€312€218Very Good
2019€188€328€228Excellent
2020€171€298€208Good to Very Good
2021€134€248€182Good
2022€192€341€236Excellent
2023€158€278€202Very Good (early)

The spread between the 2019 and 2021 medians in Gevrey-Chambertin is 40% — more than double the vintage volatility seen in Pauillac over the same window. This reflects Burgundy’s smaller production volumes, making individual vineyard and producer decisions more impactful on pricing than regional vintage conditions.


Critic Rating Correlation With Pricing

Bordeaux: Scores Drive Value

In Bordeaux, the relationship between professional critic scores and market price is strong and predictable. Across our full Bordeaux dataset, we found:

  • r² = 0.71 between composite critic score (average of available ratings) and current median market price
  • Each additional point on the 100-point scale corresponds to approximately €14.20 in additional median price across all appellations
  • Wines scoring 95+ command a 2.4x price premium over wines scoring 88–90 from the same appellation and vintage

This makes Bordeaux relatively efficient as a market: critic scores are a reliable predictor of price, and value hunting means finding wines where critics have been conservative relative to peers.

Burgundy: Producer Reputation Matters More

In Burgundy, the relationship between scores and price is present but weaker:

  • r² = 0.54 between composite critic score and current median market price
  • The same 95+ score premium in Burgundy is 3.8x — higher in absolute terms but more variable
  • Producer name and vineyard classification add substantial pricing variance beyond what scores alone explain: a village-level wine from a celebrated producer like Rousseau or Mugnier can outprice a premier cru from a lesser name at identical critic scores

This makes Burgundy a more opaque market for pricing analysis — and one where collector knowledge and producer track record carry disproportionate weight.


The Burgundy Premium Is Structural, Not Cyclical

Our data confirms what the fine wine market has observed anecdotally: Burgundy’s premium over Bordeaux is not a recent speculation bubble but a structural feature of the market. The key drivers are supply-side constraints (tiny vineyard parcels, low production volumes, no possibility of meaningful expansion) rather than demand-side speculation.

This matters for investors and collectors: Burgundy prices are unlikely to mean-revert to Bordeaux levels because the supply situation cannot be replicated.

The 2018 and 2019 Sweet Spot

Across both regions, the 2018 and 2019 vintages offer the best price-to-quality ratio in our dataset. Both received excellent critical scores, yet prices remain below the 2016 ceiling in Bordeaux and the 2015/2022 peaks in Burgundy. For buyers looking to add to a cellar now, these two vintages represent the most favorable entry points.

Critic Score Inflation at the Top

Wines scoring 95 and above have become more common in both regions over our vintage window, with the proportion of 95+ wines in Bordeaux increasing from 12% of the 2015 vintage in our dataset to 19% of the 2022 vintage. This inflation at the high end of the scale partially explains why the score-price relationship has weakened slightly in recent years: when 95-point scores become routine, consumers and merchants adjust their price expectations accordingly.

White Burgundy’s Growing Appreciation

White Burgundy has seen the sharpest price appreciation in percentage terms over our vintage window, with Puligny-Montrachet median prices rising 31% from the 2015 to the 2022 vintage in our dataset. Climate change is partially responsible: warmer growing seasons have improved white Burgundy quality and consistency, attracting a broader base of buyers who previously focused exclusively on red wine.


Methodology Notes and Limitations

Price data is a snapshot. All prices were collected in April 2026 and represent a point-in-time view. Fine wine prices fluctuate based on auction results, critic releases, and seasonal demand.

Merchant selection bias. Vivino prices reflect the merchants listed on the platform, which skews toward consumer-facing retail. Cellar door, private sale, and auction prices are not captured. Millesima prices reflect a single merchant’s cellar stock and may not represent the full market range.

Critic score aggregation. We used a simple average of available critic scores. A weighted average (e.g., giving more weight to Wine Advocate in Bordeaux) would produce modestly different results.

Exchange rate sensitivity. Euro/USD movements can significantly affect the apparent relative pricing of wines sold primarily in one currency.


Conclusion: What This Analysis Required — and What It Enables

This kind of multi-source, cross-appellation analysis was, until recently, the domain of specialist wine funds and investment banks with dedicated research teams. Assembling pricing data from Vivino, enriching it with multi-critic scores from Millesima, and linking records across two datasets required significant custom tooling.

We built this analysis entirely using MrBridge’s own wine scrapers — the Vivino scraper for market pricing and community ratings, and the Millesima scraper for professional critic scores and fine wine pricing. The data collection for this study, covering 847 wines across 9 vintages, took under 4 hours of compute time on Apify.

The infrastructure that made this analysis possible is available to anyone who needs it. Whether you are a merchant optimizing your buying strategy, a collector benchmarking your cellar value, or a researcher studying fine wine market dynamics — MrBridge scrapers give you the same data advantage that previously required significant capital or institutional access.

Explore the full scrapers catalog and reach out if you have specific wine data requirements we have not yet covered. More regional studies are in the pipeline — including a deep dive into Champagne pricing dynamics and an analysis of Rhône Valley price appreciation over the past decade.

Browse more studies from MrBridge, or check our news section for the latest developments in wine data and analytics tooling.